Exposing hindutva lies against quran Qur’an 65:4 is being deliberately misrepresented. This verse is not about promoting child marriage. It is about ʿiddah (waiting period) after divorce—a legal safeguard to determine pregnancy and protect lineage, inheritance, and women’s rights. Key points Hindutva narratives hide: 1. The verse regulates an existing social reality; it does not command or encourage it. Islam often regulated pre-Islamic practices to reduce harm, not to endorse them. Slavery, polygamy, and war customs were all restricted step by step—this is basic legal history. 2. Marriage ≠ consummation in Islamic law. Classical Islamic jurisprudence is explicit: Consummation is forbidden until physical and mental maturity and absence of harm. A legal contract alone does not permit sexual relations. 3. The Qur’an sets ethical conditions elsewhere. Qur’an 4:6 links marriage-related responsibility to rushd (sound judgment/maturity), not childhood. The Prophet ﷺ explicitly said: “There should be no harm and no reciprocating harm” (Ibn Mājah). 4. ʿIddah protects women — it does not sexualize them. The waiting period applies to: post-menopausal women pregnant women women with irregular cycles It is a legal classification, not a moral endorsement. 5. Selective outrage exposes bad faith. If concern were genuinely about women’s dignity, critics would also address: child marriage sanctioned historically in many cultures caste-based sexual exploitation scriptures that deny Shudras education or bodily autonomy Mocking a legal verse without reading what it actually governs is not criticism it is propaganda. If someone wants an honest debate, read the whole Qur’an, juristic tradition, and historical context. If someone wants mockery, then logic and facts will always defeat noise. #🕋 مکہ و مدینہ 🕌 #👳‍♂جمعہ کی سنتیں🕋 #🕋جمعہ مبارک ویڈیو 🎥 #🕌بیت المقدس☪️ #☪️حضرت عمر ؓ کے اقوال📝