INSTALL
लोकप्रिय
mounika
6K ने देखा
•
3 दिन पहले
#📒రాజకీయాల్లో సూపర్ బిగ్డే..డీలిమిటేషన్ బిల్లు👈
36
39
कमेंट
Your browser does not support JavaScript!
![📒రాజకీయాల్లో సూపర్ బిగ్డే..డీలిమిటేషన్ బిల్లు👈 - Ztinuustan Cimes (HURSDNI[APRII 2o2s] High on seats; low on trust India $ federal pact is under strain as consensus cludes the bills Un WOIEn quota and delimitation २०२६, no one in their right mind can or will really oppose reserving seats for woment Parliament and stateassemblies womenaccount . foraround half the population and the plan to third of the seats in legislatures for them reserve only fair (cven ifit seems inequitable; idcally it RDDIIG should be hall) In Indiathe Delimitation Commission usually dccidcs Whichscatsarct0 Dc reserved: For instance;the last Delimitation Commission rescrved scats for Scheduled Castes although this did not increase the overall number of | scats. That commission ೩lso rcdrew the boundaries 0f ` assembly and parliamentary constituencies to ensure some homogencity (in voter numbers) bascd on the 2001 Census The commission was not required to] review allocation of seats | statesinthcLok Sabha based onthe 200I Census becauise Constitutional amendmenthadalrcadyputoff this tasktill the first. census published alter 20261 Ihe legislative push to fast-track the reservation for legislatures which would have otherwise MOmer I[ happened 2034;the 2023 law said the process| onlyin would follow the census and delimitation irlvolves ೩ Constitutional amendment bill raising thecap] seats in the Lok Sabha to 850 (from the current 550), and a billon the creation and mandate ofthenext delimitation commission The draftof the bill says the latest available census in this case;the 2011 Census will be the basis for the delimitation While this might only mean a small change in the proportional representation of states, the fact that UP and Bihar relatively less developed states thathave notmanaged growthas effectivelyas some others - populationg gain 17%6 and12% (interms of proportionalrepresentation) and Tamil Nadu and Kerala (attheotherendofthe specurumj lose I2%andI% is problematic In private conversations with the media and political parties the government has indicated that thenumber 0ೆ scats wil just be increased propor tionately, by 500, adding wth no chanse in proportional representation that this cannot be partof thcamendment itself because the allocation has tolbe decided bythe delimitation commission,and it (the government) cannot tell an independent statutory body what to do; "I1uIStIIS is the message betwcen the lines: Ihisis what th ss[0n decide @dmT @VeTT i te' Lnion governmentand states wouldn t matter ruled by parties that are nOt part ofthe NDA enjoyed relationship characterised by at lcast somc amount of (TuSL; but India'$ liscal federalism compact has been under strain or atlcasta dccade They quandary for opposition parties This creates cannotopposetheamendment but haveno option but . lo oppose the delimitation bill Butwhile they have the numbers t0 prevent the amendment from being passed (icrequires Lwo-thirds support); they do not have the] strength to prevent the latter from being passed (it requires a simple majority). Thereisalso a secondary quandary onethattheto be formed Dclimitation Commission'$ members face; IFthe most porani decision beforethem Ilocation) has Ireadybcen T1ade [aris their| ole? The next three days will beinteresting Ztinuustan Cimes (HURSDNI[APRII 2o2s] High on seats; low on trust India $ federal pact is under strain as consensus cludes the bills Un WOIEn quota and delimitation २०२६, no one in their right mind can or will really oppose reserving seats for woment Parliament and stateassemblies womenaccount . foraround half the population and the plan to third of the seats in legislatures for them reserve only fair (cven ifit seems inequitable; idcally it RDDIIG should be hall) In Indiathe Delimitation Commission usually dccidcs Whichscatsarct0 Dc reserved: For instance;the last Delimitation Commission rescrved scats for Scheduled Castes although this did not increase the overall number of | scats. That commission ೩lso rcdrew the boundaries 0f ` assembly and parliamentary constituencies to ensure some homogencity (in voter numbers) bascd on the 2001 Census The commission was not required to] review allocation of seats | statesinthcLok Sabha based onthe 200I Census becauise Constitutional amendmenthadalrcadyputoff this tasktill the first. census published alter 20261 Ihe legislative push to fast-track the reservation for legislatures which would have otherwise MOmer I[ happened 2034;the 2023 law said the process| onlyin would follow the census and delimitation irlvolves ೩ Constitutional amendment bill raising thecap] seats in the Lok Sabha to 850 (from the current 550), and a billon the creation and mandate ofthenext delimitation commission The draftof the bill says the latest available census in this case;the 2011 Census will be the basis for the delimitation While this might only mean a small change in the proportional representation of states, the fact that UP and Bihar relatively less developed states thathave notmanaged growthas effectivelyas some others - populationg gain 17%6 and12% (interms of proportionalrepresentation) and Tamil Nadu and Kerala (attheotherendofthe specurumj lose I2%andI% is problematic In private conversations with the media and political parties the government has indicated that thenumber 0ೆ scats wil just be increased propor tionately, by 500, adding wth no chanse in proportional representation that this cannot be partof thcamendment itself because the allocation has tolbe decided bythe delimitation commission,and it (the government) cannot tell an independent statutory body what to do; "I1uIStIIS is the message betwcen the lines: Ihisis what th ss[0n decide @dmT @VeTT i te' Lnion governmentand states wouldn t matter ruled by parties that are nOt part ofthe NDA enjoyed relationship characterised by at lcast somc amount of (TuSL; but India'$ liscal federalism compact has been under strain or atlcasta dccade They quandary for opposition parties This creates cannotopposetheamendment but haveno option but . lo oppose the delimitation bill Butwhile they have the numbers t0 prevent the amendment from being passed (icrequires Lwo-thirds support); they do not have the] strength to prevent the latter from being passed (it requires a simple majority). Thereisalso a secondary quandary onethattheto be formed Dclimitation Commission'$ members face; IFthe most porani decision beforethem Ilocation) has Ireadybcen T1ade [aris their| ole? The next three days will beinteresting - ShareChat](https://cdn4.sharechat.com/bd5223f_s1w/compressed_sharp_40_img_534330_e749883_1776319526597_sc.jpg?tenant=sc&referrer=pwa-sharechat-service&f=597_sc.jpg "📒రాజకీయాల్లో సూపర్ బిగ్డే..డీలిమిటేషన్ బిల్లు👈 - Ztinuustan Cimes (HURSDNI[APRII 2o2s] High on seats; low on trust India $ federal pact is under strain as consensus cludes the bills Un WOIEn quota and delimitation २०२६, no one in their right mind can or will really oppose reserving seats for woment Parliament and stateassemblies womenaccount . foraround half the population and the plan to third of the seats in legislatures for them reserve only fair (cven ifit seems inequitable; idcally it RDDIIG should be hall) In Indiathe Delimitation Commission usually dccidcs Whichscatsarct0 Dc reserved: For instance;the last Delimitation Commission rescrved scats for Scheduled Castes although this did not increase the overall number of | scats. That commission ೩lso rcdrew the boundaries 0f ` assembly and parliamentary constituencies to ensure some homogencity (in voter numbers) bascd on the 2001 Census The commission was not required to] review allocation of seats | statesinthcLok Sabha based onthe 200I Census becauise Constitutional amendmenthadalrcadyputoff this tasktill the first. census published alter 20261 Ihe legislative push to fast-track the reservation for legislatures which would have otherwise MOmer I[ happened 2034;the 2023 law said the process| onlyin would follow the census and delimitation irlvolves ೩ Constitutional amendment bill raising thecap] seats in the Lok Sabha to 850 (from the current 550), and a billon the creation and mandate ofthenext delimitation commission The draftof the bill says the latest available census in this case;the 2011 Census will be the basis for the delimitation While this might only mean a small change in the proportional representation of states, the fact that UP and Bihar relatively less developed states thathave notmanaged growthas effectivelyas some others - populationg gain 17%6 and12% (interms of proportionalrepresentation) and Tamil Nadu and Kerala (attheotherendofthe specurumj lose I2%andI% is problematic In private conversations with the media and political parties the government has indicated that thenumber 0ೆ scats wil just be increased propor tionately, by 500, adding wth no chanse in proportional representation that this cannot be partof thcamendment itself because the allocation has tolbe decided bythe delimitation commission,and it (the government) cannot tell an independent statutory body what to do; \"I1uIStIIS is the message betwcen the lines: Ihisis what th ss[0n decide @dmT @VeTT i te' Lnion governmentand states wouldn t matter ruled by parties that are nOt part ofthe NDA enjoyed relationship characterised by at lcast somc amount of (TuSL; but India'$ liscal federalism compact has been under strain or atlcasta dccade They quandary for opposition parties This creates cannotopposetheamendment but haveno option but . lo oppose the delimitation bill Butwhile they have the numbers t0 prevent the amendment from being passed (icrequires Lwo-thirds support); they do not have the] strength to prevent the latter from being passed (it requires a simple majority). Thereisalso a secondary quandary onethattheto be formed Dclimitation Commission'$ members face; IFthe most porani decision beforethem Ilocation) has Ireadybcen T1ade [aris their| ole? The next three days will beinteresting Ztinuustan Cimes (HURSDNI[APRII 2o2s] High on seats; low on trust India $ federal pact is under strain as consensus cludes the bills Un WOIEn quota and delimitation २०२६, no one in their right mind can or will really oppose reserving seats for woment Parliament and stateassemblies womenaccount . foraround half the population and the plan to third of the seats in legislatures for them reserve only fair (cven ifit seems inequitable; idcally it RDDIIG should be hall) In Indiathe Delimitation Commission usually dccidcs Whichscatsarct0 Dc reserved: For instance;the last Delimitation Commission rescrved scats for Scheduled Castes although this did not increase the overall number of | scats. That commission ೩lso rcdrew the boundaries 0f ` assembly and parliamentary constituencies to ensure some homogencity (in voter numbers) bascd on the 2001 Census The commission was not required to] review allocation of seats | statesinthcLok Sabha based onthe 200I Census becauise Constitutional amendmenthadalrcadyputoff this tasktill the first. census published alter 20261 Ihe legislative push to fast-track the reservation for legislatures which would have otherwise MOmer I[ happened 2034;the 2023 law said the process| onlyin would follow the census and delimitation irlvolves ೩ Constitutional amendment bill raising thecap] seats in the Lok Sabha to 850 (from the current 550), and a billon the creation and mandate ofthenext delimitation commission The draftof the bill says the latest available census in this case;the 2011 Census will be the basis for the delimitation While this might only mean a small change in the proportional representation of states, the fact that UP and Bihar relatively less developed states thathave notmanaged growthas effectivelyas some others - populationg gain 17%6 and12% (interms of proportionalrepresentation) and Tamil Nadu and Kerala (attheotherendofthe specurumj lose I2%andI% is problematic In private conversations with the media and political parties the government has indicated that thenumber 0ೆ scats wil just be increased propor tionately, by 500, adding wth no chanse in proportional representation that this cannot be partof thcamendment itself because the allocation has tolbe decided bythe delimitation commission,and it (the government) cannot tell an independent statutory body what to do; \"I1uIStIIS is the message betwcen the lines: Ihisis what th ss[0n decide @dmT @VeTT i te' Lnion governmentand states wouldn t matter ruled by parties that are nOt part ofthe NDA enjoyed relationship characterised by at lcast somc amount of (TuSL; but India'$ liscal federalism compact has been under strain or atlcasta dccade They quandary for opposition parties This creates cannotopposetheamendment but haveno option but . lo oppose the delimitation bill Butwhile they have the numbers t0 prevent the amendment from being passed (icrequires Lwo-thirds support); they do not have the] strength to prevent the latter from being passed (it requires a simple majority). Thereisalso a secondary quandary onethattheto be formed Dclimitation Commission'$ members face; IFthe most porani decision beforethem Ilocation) has Ireadybcen T1ade [aris their| ole? The next three days will beinteresting - ShareChat")