INSTALL
@ramandeep_kaur__38
Ramandeep Kaur
@ramandeep_kaur__38
9,844
फॉलोअर्स
0
फॉलोइंग
12,231
पोस्ट
ਸ਼ੇਅਰਚੈਟ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਬੱਲੇ ਬੱਲੇ
Follow
Ramandeep Kaur
588 ने देखा
#😨ਨਹਿਰ 'ਚ ਡਿੱਗੀ CRPF ਜਵਾਨਾਂ ਦੀ ਗੱਡੀ
10
3
कमेंट
Ramandeep Kaur
466 ने देखा
#😨ਨਹਿਰ 'ਚ ਡਿੱਗੀ CRPF ਜਵਾਨਾਂ ਦੀ ਗੱਡੀ
10
10
कमेंट
Ramandeep Kaur
542 ने देखा
#😨ਨਹਿਰ 'ਚ ਡਿੱਗੀ CRPF ਜਵਾਨਾਂ ਦੀ ਗੱਡੀ
10
7
कमेंट
Ramandeep Kaur
529 ने देखा
#👉ਮਾਪਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਬਿਨਾਂ ਦੱਸੇ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋਵੇਗੀ ਲਵ-ਮੈਰਿਜ
11
11
कमेंट
Ramandeep Kaur
428 ने देखा
#👉ਮਾਪਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਬਿਨਾਂ ਦੱਸੇ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋਵੇਗੀ ਲਵ-ਮੈਰਿਜ
12
13
कमेंट
Ramandeep Kaur
407 ने देखा
#🌍ਅੰਤਰਰਾਸ਼ਟਰੀ ਮਾਂ ਬੋਲੀ ਦਿਵਸ😍
15
10
कमेंट
Ramandeep Kaur
433 ने देखा
#💔ਬ੍ਰੇਕਅਪ ਡੇ😭
17
7
कमेंट
Ramandeep Kaur
557 ने देखा
#😨ਗੈਸ ਲੀਕ ਹੋਣ ਕਾਰਨ ਵੱਡਾ ਧਮਾਕਾ, 16 ਮੌਤਾਂ
10
6
कमेंट
Ramandeep Kaur
893 ने देखा
#😨ਗੈਸ ਲੀਕ ਹੋਣ ਕਾਰਨ ਵੱਡਾ ਧਮਾਕਾ, 16 ਮੌਤਾਂ
13
8
कमेंट
Ramandeep Kaur
1.1K ने देखा
#👮♂️Epstein files 'ਚ ਨਾਂ ਆਉਣ ਪਿੱਛੋਂ ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਗ੍ਰਿਫ਼ਤਾਰ
10
8
कमेंट
Your browser does not support JavaScript!
![👉ਮਾਪਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਬਿਨਾਂ ਦੱਸੇ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋਵੇਗੀ ਲਵ-ਮੈਰਿਜ - Kavish Aggarwalal The wife challenged the Australian decree by filing a review application in Australia (which was dismissed) Simultaneously she approached the Family Court in Ahmedabad seeking restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act: The husband argued that the Australian divorce decree ended the marriage leaving subsisting marital relationship and no ousting Indian court jurisdiction. The Gujorot High court rejected this argument by relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Y Narasimha Rao V Y. Venkata Lokshmi (I99I) holding thot: marriage solemnized in India can only] A be dissolved under the law governing that marriage Kavish Aggarwalal The wife challenged the Australian decree by filing a review application in Australia (which was dismissed) Simultaneously she approached the Family Court in Ahmedabad seeking restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act: The husband argued that the Australian divorce decree ended the marriage leaving subsisting marital relationship and no ousting Indian court jurisdiction. The Gujorot High court rejected this argument by relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Y Narasimha Rao V Y. Venkata Lokshmi (I99I) holding thot: marriage solemnized in India can only] A be dissolved under the law governing that marriage - ShareChat](https://cdn4.sharechat.com/bd5223f_s1w/compressed_gm_40_img_84661_18eb42c8_1771681076344_sc.jpg?tenant=sc&referrer=user-profile-service%2FrequestType50&f=344_sc.jpg "👉ਮਾਪਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਬਿਨਾਂ ਦੱਸੇ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋਵੇਗੀ ਲਵ-ਮੈਰਿਜ - Kavish Aggarwalal The wife challenged the Australian decree by filing a review application in Australia (which was dismissed) Simultaneously she approached the Family Court in Ahmedabad seeking restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act: The husband argued that the Australian divorce decree ended the marriage leaving subsisting marital relationship and no ousting Indian court jurisdiction. The Gujorot High court rejected this argument by relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Y Narasimha Rao V Y. Venkata Lokshmi (I99I) holding thot: marriage solemnized in India can only] A be dissolved under the law governing that marriage Kavish Aggarwalal The wife challenged the Australian decree by filing a review application in Australia (which was dismissed) Simultaneously she approached the Family Court in Ahmedabad seeking restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act: The husband argued that the Australian divorce decree ended the marriage leaving subsisting marital relationship and no ousting Indian court jurisdiction. The Gujorot High court rejected this argument by relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Y Narasimha Rao V Y. Venkata Lokshmi (I99I) holding thot: marriage solemnized in India can only] A be dissolved under the law governing that marriage - ShareChat")
