Trumplomacy: It’s Absolutely Out of Depth… “When a nation confuses loudness with leadership, it begins to mistake isolation for strength.” oOo - “That’s the cryptic summation of Trumplomacy.” A foreign policy is not built on vision, diplomacy, or long-term strategy — but on disruption, spectacle, and arrogance masquerading as decisiveness. President Donald Trump’s approach to international relations has consistently reflected one principle: the world must bend to America’s convenience, or be discarded. But global diplomacy is not a corporate boardroom where contracts can be cancelled at will, and alliances cannot be treated like monthly subscriptions. Trump’s reported decision to withdraw the United States from 66 international organizations, including 31 UN-affiliated bodies, on the grounds that they are “wasteful, ineffective, or contrary to U.S. interests,” is not merely controversial — it is reckless. Of course, every government has the right to evaluate its commitments and ensure value for its taxpayer money. But the language and manner of such a move reveal something deeper: a refusal to accept that global systems exist not to glorify American interests alone, but to maintain an order where even powerful nations are accountable. This is not policy reform. This is a political tantrum dressed up as a strategy. International organizations are imperfect, often slow, and frequently frustrating. Yet they serve as diplomatic shock absorbers — spaces where tensions are moderated, dialogue is maintained, and conflicts are prevented from turning into catastrophic confrontations. Walking away from them is not “saving money.” It is a surrender of influence. The irony is brutal: America spends decades building frameworks of global governance, only for one leader to tear them down because they do not offer immediate applause. History has witnessed great American leaders who understood the power of engagement. Eisenhower exercised restraint even when America had unmatched post-war strength. Theodore Roosevelt believed in projecting power, yes — but also in the discipline of diplomacy. John F. Kennedy faced the Cuban Missile Crisis not with insults and threats, but with careful negotiation and crisis management. These men led with a combination of strength and sophistication. Trump, despite his business acumen, cannot match their stature. At best, he may be remembered the way Richard Nixon is remembered — though even that comparison flatters him. Nixon, notorious as he was, understood global chess. He reshaped international relations with calculated diplomacy, including the strategic opening to China. Trump, on the other hand, plays checkers while claiming to reinvent chess, only to flip the board when he begins to lose. And that is what makes Trumplomacy “out of depth.” It tries to bully the world into submission while ignoring a simple truth: no country can fight against the rest of the world indefinitely, no matter how powerful it is. The United States is strong, but strength is not only military or economic. Strength is credibility. Strength is consistency. Strength is trust. Trump drags America into the streets of world politics — shouting, threatening, withdrawing — without understanding that global leadership is not about dominance, but about responsibility. A superpower cannot behave like a corner-shop owner angrily closing his shutters because customers have opinions. The world does not stop functioning when the U.S. storms out. It reorganizes — slowly, steadily, and sometimes dangerously — without America at the center. In the end, Trumplomacy may not weaken the world as much as it weakens America itself. Because isolation is not strength. It is a retreat. And retreat, when disguised as pride, is the most expensive mistake any nation can make. #📺அரசியல் 360🔴 #🚹உளவியல் சிந்தனை